<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1594 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173949</link>
    <description>The HC declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on alleged clandestine removal and the resulting duty and penalty, holding that the controversy turned essentially on evidence appreciation rather than any clear perversity. The Tribunal had considered the assessee&#039;s documents as well as the Revenue&#039;s reliance on predominantly inculpatory statements, including retracted statements of the Director and authorised signatory. The court also noted that the tax effect was extremely low and the total duty and penalty were negligible. In view of the factual nature of the dispute and the materials examined, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1594 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173949</link>
      <description>The HC declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on alleged clandestine removal and the resulting duty and penalty, holding that the controversy turned essentially on evidence appreciation rather than any clear perversity. The Tribunal had considered the assessee&#039;s documents as well as the Revenue&#039;s reliance on predominantly inculpatory statements, including retracted statements of the Director and authorised signatory. The court also noted that the tax effect was extremely low and the total duty and penalty were negligible. In view of the factual nature of the dispute and the materials examined, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>