https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173942 The petitioner challenged interim orders under the Customs Act, 1962, seeking release of seized goods. Respondents argued for dismissal due to availability of statutory appeal. Petitioner withdrew writ petition with liberty to appeal, requesting time to appeal and continuation of stay. Parties agreed, leading to writ petition dismissal. Petitioner allowed to appeal within ten days with interim stay application. Court directed stay decision in five days, appeal disposal in two months. Stay order operated for fifteen days. Parties bore own costs. Stay and Article 226(3) applications disposed of, ending legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173942 The petitioner challenged interim orders under the Customs Act, 1962, seeking release of seized goods. Respondents argued for dismissal due to availability of statutory appeal. Petitioner withdrew writ petition with liberty to appeal, requesting time to appeal and continuation of stay. Parties agreed, leading to writ petition dismissal. Petitioner allowed to appeal within ten days with interim stay application. Court directed stay decision in five days, appeal disposal in two months. Stay order operated for fifteen days. Parties bore own costs. Stay and Article 226(3) applications disposed of, ending legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173942