<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173940</link>
    <description>The appeal in a Central Excise matter was dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Collector of Central Excise v. Ram Body Builders. The order does not state any fresh reasoning and indicates that the prior precedent governed the controversy, leading to dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173940</link>
      <description>The appeal in a Central Excise matter was dismissed in view of the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Collector of Central Excise v. Ram Body Builders. The order does not state any fresh reasoning and indicates that the prior precedent governed the controversy, leading to dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>