https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173939 A body empowered to appoint a committee may also fix the quorum for its meetings as an incidental incident of that power. Where a three-member standing committee was validly convened with a quorum of two, those two members could lawfully transact business and give a binding unanimous decision. Regulation 32.1 did not require the full strength of the committee; it only directed the next step if a duly constituted committee was not unanimous. The absence of the third member did not invalidate the proceedings, particularly where no breach of natural justice or procedural rule was shown. The appeals succeeded, the High Court's majority view was set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173939 A body empowered to appoint a committee may also fix the quorum for its meetings as an incidental incident of that power. Where a three-member standing committee was validly convened with a quorum of two, those two members could lawfully transact business and give a binding unanimous decision. Regulation 32.1 did not require the full strength of the committee; it only directed the next step if a duly constituted committee was not unanimous. The absence of the third member did not invalidate the proceedings, particularly where no breach of natural justice or procedural rule was shown. The appeals succeeded, the High Court's majority view was set aside, and the writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173939