<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 654 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039;s Order dismissing appeals for non-compliance with a Stay Order. The Tribunal found a patent illegality in the dismissal without considering the modification application based on financial hardship. Emphasizing the need for a show cause notice before such dismissals, the Tribunal remanded the matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal, instructing reconsideration of the modification application and granting the appellants a fair opportunity to present their case. As a result, the appeals were allowed by remand, leading to the resolution of all associated Stay Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 654 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039;s Order dismissing appeals for non-compliance with a Stay Order. The Tribunal found a patent illegality in the dismissal without considering the modification application based on financial hardship. Emphasizing the need for a show cause notice before such dismissals, the Tribunal remanded the matters to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal, instructing reconsideration of the modification application and granting the appellants a fair opportunity to present their case. As a result, the appeals were allowed by remand, leading to the resolution of all associated Stay Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>