https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264462 A cease and desist order under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act could not stand because the notice of enquiry and materials on record did not establish any pleaded unfair trade practice under Section 36A. The Commission was required to confine itself to the specific allegations, apply the statutory test, and base any finding on legally sufficient material; instead, it relied on subjective notions of unfairness and went beyond the notice without further notice, contrary to fairness and natural justice. The direction was quashed because no unfair trade practice was made out on the pleadings and materials. en-us Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264462 A cease and desist order under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act could not stand because the notice of enquiry and materials on record did not establish any pleaded unfair trade practice under Section 36A. The Commission was required to confine itself to the specific allegations, apply the statutory test, and base any finding on legally sufficient material; instead, it relied on subjective notions of unfairness and went beyond the notice without further notice, contrary to fairness and natural justice. The direction was quashed because no unfair trade practice was made out on the pleadings and materials. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264462