<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264453</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty in its entirety by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on cogent reasons provided in the order. The court found the reasoning valid both factually and legally, concluding that the deletion of the penalty was justified based on the bona fide and substantiated explanation provided by the assessee. The Tribunal also affirmed the decision, with the court determining that the orders did not suffer from any error of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264453</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty in its entirety by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on cogent reasons provided in the order. The court found the reasoning valid both factually and legally, concluding that the deletion of the penalty was justified based on the bona fide and substantiated explanation provided by the assessee. The Tribunal also affirmed the decision, with the court determining that the orders did not suffer from any error of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>