<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1116 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264448</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the additional conveyance allowance received by the assessee was not eligible for exemption under section 10(14)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court overturned the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the lack of evidence for expenditure reimbursement and absence of a notification exempting the allowance. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Revenue, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1116 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264448</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the additional conveyance allowance received by the assessee was not eligible for exemption under section 10(14)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court overturned the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the lack of evidence for expenditure reimbursement and absence of a notification exempting the allowance. The appeal was allowed in favor of the Revenue, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>