<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1106 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264438</link>
    <description>Project-specific architectural and interior design services do not become fees for technical services merely because they involve specialist skill; where the consultants do not transfer technical know-how, experience, skill, or a design capable of independent future use, the payments fall outside section 9(1)(vii) and the India-Singapore DTAA fee-for-technical-services limb. A liberal approach to condonation of delay applies when the explanation is satisfactory and no negligence or lack of bona fides is shown. For Thailand consultants, architectural and design receipts were not taxable in India because the treaty contained no applicable basis to tax them as business income, fees for technical services, or under the residual article, and the absence of a permanent establishment meant the more beneficial treaty position prevailed under section 90(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1106 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264438</link>
      <description>Project-specific architectural and interior design services do not become fees for technical services merely because they involve specialist skill; where the consultants do not transfer technical know-how, experience, skill, or a design capable of independent future use, the payments fall outside section 9(1)(vii) and the India-Singapore DTAA fee-for-technical-services limb. A liberal approach to condonation of delay applies when the explanation is satisfactory and no negligence or lack of bona fides is shown. For Thailand consultants, architectural and design receipts were not taxable in India because the treaty contained no applicable basis to tax them as business income, fees for technical services, or under the residual article, and the absence of a permanent establishment meant the more beneficial treaty position prevailed under section 90(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>