<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1105 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264437</link>
    <description>Exclusive satellite telecast rights in cinematographic films for 99 years were treated as copyright-related rights used for television broadcasting, so the consideration was characterised as royalty and subjected to tax deduction under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, relief from disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was denied, and the contrary view that the transfer was a sale was distinguished on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1105 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264437</link>
      <description>Exclusive satellite telecast rights in cinematographic films for 99 years were treated as copyright-related rights used for television broadcasting, so the consideration was characterised as royalty and subjected to tax deduction under Section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, relief from disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was denied, and the contrary view that the transfer was a sale was distinguished on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>