<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 17 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s decision to categorize the appellant&#039;s services as Consultant Engineer instead of Management Consultant without allowing the appellant to address this new allegation was deemed inappropriate. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) to ensure a lawful decision based on the observations made in the judgment, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 17 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s decision to categorize the appellant&#039;s services as Consultant Engineer instead of Management Consultant without allowing the appellant to address this new allegation was deemed inappropriate. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) to ensure a lawful decision based on the observations made in the judgment, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>