https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173934 A university lost power to cancel a candidate's candidature on shortage of attendance after it had already permitted him to sit for the examination, because the ordinance allowed withdrawal only before the examination and the attendance certificate was merely provisional. The cancellation was therefore without jurisdiction on that ground. It also could not be sustained on the alleged absence of permission from superior officers, since no university rule required such permission and the impugned order did not rest on that basis. The cancellation order was quashed and the examination result was directed to be declared in accordance with the decision. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173934 A university lost power to cancel a candidate's candidature on shortage of attendance after it had already permitted him to sit for the examination, because the ordinance allowed withdrawal only before the examination and the attendance certificate was merely provisional. The cancellation was therefore without jurisdiction on that ground. It also could not be sustained on the alleged absence of permission from superior officers, since no university rule required such permission and the impugned order did not rest on that basis. The cancellation order was quashed and the examination result was directed to be declared in accordance with the decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173934