<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to disallow 12.5% of the purchases instead of the entire amount, as purchases were made but from different parties than claimed. The rejection of books of accounts under Section 145(3) was upheld due to discrepancies. The decision was pronounced on July 26, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1127 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to disallow 12.5% of the purchases instead of the entire amount, as purchases were made but from different parties than claimed. The rejection of books of accounts under Section 145(3) was upheld due to discrepancies. The decision was pronounced on July 26, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>