<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 546 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173922</link>
    <description>Vacancies arising after an amendment to the service rules had to be filled under the amended regime, while vacancies arising before the amendment remained governed by the unamended rules. Selections made without applying the rules in force on the date the vacancy arose could not be treated as final appointments; they were only temporary and remained subject to fresh consideration by the DPC under the amended rules, with the Government able to make interim promotions or revise the select list under the enabling provision. A carried forward vacancy did not alter that position, and the promotion of the retired officer was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 546 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173922</link>
      <description>Vacancies arising after an amendment to the service rules had to be filled under the amended regime, while vacancies arising before the amendment remained governed by the unamended rules. Selections made without applying the rules in force on the date the vacancy arose could not be treated as final appointments; they were only temporary and remained subject to fresh consideration by the DPC under the amended rules, with the Government able to make interim promotions or revise the select list under the enabling provision. A carried forward vacancy did not alter that position, and the promotion of the retired officer was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>