<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173912</link>
    <description>In university recruitment, where an advertisement does not fix a separate eligibility date, qualifications must be assessed with reference to the last date for submitting applications, and candidates who qualify later cannot be treated as eligible for that selection. Any relaxation of prescribed qualifications must be expressly disclosed in the advertisement with its conditions, and the reasons for granting relaxation to each candidate must be recorded. Preservation of selection records is essential, because missing or destroyed minutes may justify an adverse inference if the process is challenged. The note also states that such defects may not always lead to quashing where later circumstances make that impracticable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173912</link>
      <description>In university recruitment, where an advertisement does not fix a separate eligibility date, qualifications must be assessed with reference to the last date for submitting applications, and candidates who qualify later cannot be treated as eligible for that selection. Any relaxation of prescribed qualifications must be expressly disclosed in the advertisement with its conditions, and the reasons for granting relaxation to each candidate must be recorded. Preservation of selection records is essential, because missing or destroyed minutes may justify an adverse inference if the process is challenged. The note also states that such defects may not always lead to quashing where later circumstances make that impracticable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>