https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173908 An earlier final writ decision had already held that enhanced supervision charges were not recoverable retrospectively, and that determination operated as res judicata between the same parties. A later demand on the same foundational claim, including interest, could not reopen a matter conclusively decided in writ proceedings. Because the subsequent notices had no independent legal basis and merely repeated the barred claim, they were unsustainable in law. The impugned demands were quashed and the earlier final adjudication was left undisturbed. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173908 An earlier final writ decision had already held that enhanced supervision charges were not recoverable retrospectively, and that determination operated as res judicata between the same parties. A later demand on the same foundational claim, including interest, could not reopen a matter conclusively decided in writ proceedings. Because the subsequent notices had no independent legal basis and merely repeated the barred claim, they were unsustainable in law. The impugned demands were quashed and the earlier final adjudication was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173908