<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173903</link>
    <description>Rectification of the appellate order allowing deductions under sections 54EC and 54 was upheld because it merely aligned the order with the factual position already accepted in earlier appellate proceedings. The record showed no further modification to the direction granted by the Commissioner (Appeals), so no interference was warranted. The department&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the rectification order remained in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:40:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173903</link>
      <description>Rectification of the appellate order allowing deductions under sections 54EC and 54 was upheld because it merely aligned the order with the factual position already accepted in earlier appellate proceedings. The record showed no further modification to the direction granted by the Commissioner (Appeals), so no interference was warranted. The department&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the rectification order remained in force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>