https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173893 Eligibility for the housing scheme depended on satisfying cumulative conditions in the 31.1.1986 circular, including registration, prior purchase of the land, and handing over vacant and peaceful possession before publication under Section 50(2). As the appellant was neither the landowner nor in possession, it acquired no enforceable right and was not eligible for the benefit. A claim based on Article 14 also failed because negative equality cannot be used to seek parity with an erroneous or illegal benefit granted to others. The challenge was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173893 Eligibility for the housing scheme depended on satisfying cumulative conditions in the 31.1.1986 circular, including registration, prior purchase of the land, and handing over vacant and peaceful possession before publication under Section 50(2). As the appellant was neither the landowner nor in possession, it acquired no enforceable right and was not eligible for the benefit. A claim based on Article 14 also failed because negative equality cannot be used to seek parity with an erroneous or illegal benefit granted to others. The challenge was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173893