https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173892 A purchaser who acquires land after publication of a Section 4(1) acquisition notification is not entitled to benefit under a land allotment policy confined to persons who owned the land on that date. Such post-notification purchase is made at the purchaser's peril, and the transfer does not bind the Government once the land vests in the State free from encumbrances under Section 16. A later government clarification applied only to a narrow class of earlier applicants who had timely applications, favourable orders, and executed agreements, conditions not met here. The Article 14 challenge also failed because equality cannot be claimed to repeat a special concession or an alleged erroneous benefit. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:43:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173892 A purchaser who acquires land after publication of a Section 4(1) acquisition notification is not entitled to benefit under a land allotment policy confined to persons who owned the land on that date. Such post-notification purchase is made at the purchaser's peril, and the transfer does not bind the Government once the land vests in the State free from encumbrances under Section 16. A later government clarification applied only to a narrow class of earlier applicants who had timely applications, favourable orders, and executed agreements, conditions not met here. The Article 14 challenge also failed because equality cannot be claimed to repeat a special concession or an alleged erroneous benefit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173892