<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1382 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173889</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT&#039;s revision under section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue due to the incorrect application of deduction u/s 10A for a non-SEZ unit. The ITAT upheld the revision, emphasizing the importance of accurate legal application and consideration of all relevant factors in assessments to prevent adverse impacts on revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1382 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173889</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT&#039;s revision under section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue due to the incorrect application of deduction u/s 10A for a non-SEZ unit. The ITAT upheld the revision, emphasizing the importance of accurate legal application and consideration of all relevant factors in assessments to prevent adverse impacts on revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>