<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 12 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406</link>
    <description>Rule 3(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 allowed MODVAT credit to be used for payment of duty on any final product, and the credit was treated as indefeasible. No co-relation was required between the input on which credit arose and the final product on which duty was paid, so product-wise segregation of credit was inconsistent with the rule and the Board&#039;s circular. The assessee was therefore entitled to utilise credit across its final products, and the demand based on segregation was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 12 - Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406</link>
      <description>Rule 3(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 allowed MODVAT credit to be used for payment of duty on any final product, and the credit was treated as indefeasible. No co-relation was required between the input on which credit arose and the final product on which duty was paid, so product-wise segregation of credit was inconsistent with the rule and the Board&#039;s circular. The assessee was therefore entitled to utilise credit across its final products, and the demand based on segregation was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>