<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1097 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand, noting the appellant discharged tax liability belatedly. The Commissioner was directed to compute any interest due within thirty days. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were also set aside, as the extended period was unjustified. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1097 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand, noting the appellant discharged tax liability belatedly. The Commissioner was directed to compute any interest due within thirty days. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were also set aside, as the extended period was unjustified. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>