<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1088 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264420</link>
    <description>Service tax exemption under Notification No. 4/2004-ST was held to extend to services provided to a unit in a Special Economic Zone for consumption within that area, not only to services rendered to a developer. The denial of exemption below was found to rest on an erroneous, piecemeal reading of the notification. As the service recipient was an SEZ unit and that status was not disputed, the notification conditions were satisfied and the exemption was admissible to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1088 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264420</link>
      <description>Service tax exemption under Notification No. 4/2004-ST was held to extend to services provided to a unit in a Special Economic Zone for consumption within that area, not only to services rendered to a developer. The denial of exemption below was found to rest on an erroneous, piecemeal reading of the notification. As the service recipient was an SEZ unit and that status was not disputed, the notification conditions were satisfied and the exemption was admissible to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>