https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264405 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant. However, the demand for the differential drawback amount and interest was maintained. The decision was based on the non-applicability of confiscation and penalties due to the goods being already exported and not physically available for confiscation. The ruling aligned with established legal principles and previous judicial precedents regarding fines and penalties under the Customs Act. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:56:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264405 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellant. However, the demand for the differential drawback amount and interest was maintained. The decision was based on the non-applicability of confiscation and penalties due to the goods being already exported and not physically available for confiscation. The ruling aligned with established legal principles and previous judicial precedents regarding fines and penalties under the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264405