<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1070 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264402</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding SEBI&#039;s orders and the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant&#039;s main contentions were found to be without merit, and the requirement for a public announcement under Regulation 11(1) and 14(1) was affirmed. The plea regarding Regulation 14(2) was rejected as it was not applicable to the case at hand. The appellant was directed to pay consolidated costs of Rs. 50,000 to SEBI within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1070 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264402</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, upholding SEBI&#039;s orders and the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant&#039;s main contentions were found to be without merit, and the requirement for a public announcement under Regulation 11(1) and 14(1) was affirmed. The plea regarding Regulation 14(2) was rejected as it was not applicable to the case at hand. The appellant was directed to pay consolidated costs of Rs. 50,000 to SEBI within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>