https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264399 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only where the trial court's view is perverse or unreasonable; where the trial court has taken a possible view, the accused retains the reinforced presumption of innocence and the benefit of doubt. A dying declaration marked by doubts about authenticity, overwriting, insertion of names in different ink, and lack of clear support from medical or recording witnesses could not safely displace the acquittal, especially when the eye-witnesses had turned hostile. The High Court was therefore unjustified in reversing the acquittal, and the conviction was set aside while the trial court's acquittal was restored. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:55:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264399 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only where the trial court's view is perverse or unreasonable; where the trial court has taken a possible view, the accused retains the reinforced presumption of innocence and the benefit of doubt. A dying declaration marked by doubts about authenticity, overwriting, insertion of names in different ink, and lack of clear support from medical or recording witnesses could not safely displace the acquittal, especially when the eye-witnesses had turned hostile. The High Court was therefore unjustified in reversing the acquittal, and the conviction was set aside while the trial court's acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264399