<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1066 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264398</link>
    <description>Tenancy rights treated by the parties and the municipal authority as a joint tenancy on the original tenant&#039;s death could not be lawfully transferred exclusively to one heir on the basis of a convenience-based consent letter or an unprobated will dealing only with the nursery business. The later municipal transfer, made after objections and without bona fide consideration, was therefore invalid, and the surrender and lease founded on it were void ab initio. The article also notes that an appellate court may consider subsequent events where later developments materially affect relief; because construction proceeded under interim protection and equities changed, moulding the relief by directing allotment of five flats was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1066 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264398</link>
      <description>Tenancy rights treated by the parties and the municipal authority as a joint tenancy on the original tenant&#039;s death could not be lawfully transferred exclusively to one heir on the basis of a convenience-based consent letter or an unprobated will dealing only with the nursery business. The later municipal transfer, made after objections and without bona fide consideration, was therefore invalid, and the surrender and lease founded on it were void ab initio. The article also notes that an appellate court may consider subsequent events where later developments materially affect relief; because construction proceeded under interim protection and equities changed, moulding the relief by directing allotment of five flats was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>