<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264397</link>
    <description>Vacant land subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 must be valued for wealth-tax on the basis of open market value under section 7(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, taking ceiling restrictions into account because they depress market value. The statutory compensation under the Ceiling Act does not automatically replace market valuation, although where acquisition is underway and the competent authority has fixed maximum compensation for excess land, that amount may reflect the value a willing purchaser would pay. The excess vacant land was valued at the compensation figure, while the remaining vacant land had to be separately valued and included for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264397</link>
      <description>Vacant land subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 must be valued for wealth-tax on the basis of open market value under section 7(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, taking ceiling restrictions into account because they depress market value. The statutory compensation under the Ceiling Act does not automatically replace market valuation, although where acquisition is underway and the competent authority has fixed maximum compensation for excess land, that amount may reflect the value a willing purchaser would pay. The excess vacant land was valued at the compensation figure, while the remaining vacant land had to be separately valued and included for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>