<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264393</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal after finding that the Assessee had adequately substantiated business expenses with detailed documentation, leading to the conclusion that no substantial legal questions merited further consideration. The judgment primarily addressed delay condonation in re-filing appeals, the correctness of the ITAT order on expenses disallowance, production of vouchers for business expenses, and the determination of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1061 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264393</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal after finding that the Assessee had adequately substantiated business expenses with detailed documentation, leading to the conclusion that no substantial legal questions merited further consideration. The judgment primarily addressed delay condonation in re-filing appeals, the correctness of the ITAT order on expenses disallowance, production of vouchers for business expenses, and the determination of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>