<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1048 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264380</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to reopen assessments for multiple years. It was determined that the Assessing Officer had sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment, justifying the reopening. The court dismissed the petitions, stating that the petitioner could present their case during the reassessment proceedings, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:54:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1048 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264380</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to reopen assessments for multiple years. It was determined that the Assessing Officer had sufficient grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment, justifying the reopening. The court dismissed the petitions, stating that the petitioner could present their case during the reassessment proceedings, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>