<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173865</link>
    <description>A disciplinary dismissal could not be sustained where the charge-sheet was vague and the material relied on in the enquiry had not been properly supplied to the employee. A charge alleging breach of governmental orders must set out the relevant orders, including their dates and numbers, and the supporting material must be disclosed if it is used against the delinquent employee. The enquiry record did not satisfy this requirement, and the respondent was found only to have renewed deposits made by predecessors, which weakened any basis for personal culpability. The defective charge and nondisclosure offended natural justice, so the finding of misconduct and the dismissal were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173865</link>
      <description>A disciplinary dismissal could not be sustained where the charge-sheet was vague and the material relied on in the enquiry had not been properly supplied to the employee. A charge alleging breach of governmental orders must set out the relevant orders, including their dates and numbers, and the supporting material must be disclosed if it is used against the delinquent employee. The enquiry record did not satisfy this requirement, and the respondent was found only to have renewed deposits made by predecessors, which weakened any basis for personal culpability. The defective charge and nondisclosure offended natural justice, so the finding of misconduct and the dismissal were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>