<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 10 - CESTAT New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of credit for duty paid on welding electrodes as inputs for cement manufacturers. Despite acknowledging the importance of welding electrodes for machinery maintenance, the tribunal held that they do not qualify as inputs for Cenvat Credit, relying on precedent. The penalty imposed was deemed unwarranted due to the ongoing dispute, resulting in its setting aside and partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 10 - CESTAT New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of credit for duty paid on welding electrodes as inputs for cement manufacturers. Despite acknowledging the importance of welding electrodes for machinery maintenance, the tribunal held that they do not qualify as inputs for Cenvat Credit, relying on precedent. The penalty imposed was deemed unwarranted due to the ongoing dispute, resulting in its setting aside and partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>