<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 637 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173864</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the export turnover from the EPZ unit should not be excluded when calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the beneficial nature of the provision in encouraging exports and found that the deduction formula did not reference total income, making the export turnover integral to the computation. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that income from the EPZ unit, once excluded from total income, could not be reintroduced for deduction purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 637 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173864</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the export turnover from the EPZ unit should not be excluded when calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the beneficial nature of the provision in encouraging exports and found that the deduction formula did not reference total income, making the export turnover integral to the computation. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that income from the EPZ unit, once excluded from total income, could not be reintroduced for deduction purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>