https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173859 Where a retirement rule allows the appointing authority to withhold permission to retire only by a positive decision, that decision must be communicated before superannuation; mere inaction is insufficient. Because no communicated order withholding retirement existed before the employee reached the retirement age, he was treated as having effectively retired. Once retirement took effect, disciplinary jurisdiction ended and punishment could not validly be imposed thereafter. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:31:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173859 Where a retirement rule allows the appointing authority to withhold permission to retire only by a positive decision, that decision must be communicated before superannuation; mere inaction is insufficient. Because no communicated order withholding retirement existed before the employee reached the retirement age, he was treated as having effectively retired. Once retirement took effect, disciplinary jurisdiction ended and punishment could not validly be imposed thereafter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173859