<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383</link>
    <description>The Forty-sixth Constitutional Amendment permits sales tax on a works contract only to the extent that the transaction genuinely involves a sale, actual or deemed, of goods. A contract does not become a works contract merely because materials pass incidentally during performance; the controlling test is the dominant intention of the transaction. Where the primary object is skilled labour or service and any transfer of material is only incidental, the arrangement remains a contract of work and labour and is not a taxable sale. Applied to photographic services, the activity was treated as essentially artistic and service-oriented, so the levy on turnover could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383</link>
      <description>The Forty-sixth Constitutional Amendment permits sales tax on a works contract only to the extent that the transaction genuinely involves a sale, actual or deemed, of goods. A contract does not become a works contract merely because materials pass incidentally during performance; the controlling test is the dominant intention of the transaction. Where the primary object is skilled labour or service and any transfer of material is only incidental, the arrangement remains a contract of work and labour and is not a taxable sale. Applied to photographic services, the activity was treated as essentially artistic and service-oriented, so the levy on turnover could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>