https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173843 A confession recorded in compliance with Section 15 of the TADA Act is admissible as substantive evidence and, if voluntary and truthful, can by itself sustain conviction without further corroboration. The Court found the appellant's confession to have been recorded with the required safeguards and accepted it as voluntary and truthful. It also treated the injured eyewitness's identification evidence, supported by the co-accused's confession, as sufficient corroboration of the appellant's involvement. Challenges based on alleged inconsistencies, delay in identification proceedings, and the approver's testimony were rejected, and the conviction under TADA and allied offences was upheld. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173843 A confession recorded in compliance with Section 15 of the TADA Act is admissible as substantive evidence and, if voluntary and truthful, can by itself sustain conviction without further corroboration. The Court found the appellant's confession to have been recorded with the required safeguards and accepted it as voluntary and truthful. It also treated the injured eyewitness's identification evidence, supported by the co-accused's confession, as sufficient corroboration of the appellant's involvement. Challenges based on alleged inconsistencies, delay in identification proceedings, and the approver's testimony were rejected, and the conviction under TADA and allied offences was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173843