<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173834</link>
    <description>District Government Counsel engage in a professional, not civil post, relationship governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Legal Remembrancer&#039;s Manual, so renewal is not a matter of right. The text states that judicial review is limited to illegality, arbitrariness, unfairness, or procedural defect, and does not extend to substituting the State&#039;s choice on merits. It further explains that consultation between the District Magistrate and the District Judge must be meaningful, with the District Judge&#039;s view ordinarily given primacy, but not absolute binding force. The constitutional collegium model was held inapplicable to this field, and courts cannot create a new appointment mechanism contrary to the governing framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173834</link>
      <description>District Government Counsel engage in a professional, not civil post, relationship governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Legal Remembrancer&#039;s Manual, so renewal is not a matter of right. The text states that judicial review is limited to illegality, arbitrariness, unfairness, or procedural defect, and does not extend to substituting the State&#039;s choice on merits. It further explains that consultation between the District Magistrate and the District Judge must be meaningful, with the District Judge&#039;s view ordinarily given primacy, but not absolute binding force. The constitutional collegium model was held inapplicable to this field, and courts cannot create a new appointment mechanism contrary to the governing framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>