<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 572 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173831</link>
    <description>Externment under the Delhi Police Act depends on the authority&#039;s satisfaction based on relevant material, and judicial review is limited to the grounds specified in the statute and recognised review standards. An externment order is not invalid merely because it lacks elaborate reasons or a detailed rejection of every alternative, so long as the record shows material supporting the decision and application of mind to the available options. Courts cannot substitute their own view simply because another course was possible. On that basis, the externment order was held valid and the High Court was not justified in quashing it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 572 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173831</link>
      <description>Externment under the Delhi Police Act depends on the authority&#039;s satisfaction based on relevant material, and judicial review is limited to the grounds specified in the statute and recognised review standards. An externment order is not invalid merely because it lacks elaborate reasons or a detailed rejection of every alternative, so long as the record shows material supporting the decision and application of mind to the available options. Courts cannot substitute their own view simply because another course was possible. On that basis, the externment order was held valid and the High Court was not justified in quashing it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>