https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173826 Conviction for murder on approver testimony alone requires independent corroboration of material particulars connecting the accused to the offence; test identification parade statements are not substantive evidence by themselves. Where recovered articles are not reliably proved to belong to the deceased, the identifying witness is not examined, and the accomplice account is unnatural or lacks assurance, the prudential rule against unsafe reliance on uncorroborated accomplice evidence is not satisfied. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:12:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173826 Conviction for murder on approver testimony alone requires independent corroboration of material particulars connecting the accused to the offence; test identification parade statements are not substantive evidence by themselves. Where recovered articles are not reliably proved to belong to the deceased, the identifying witness is not examined, and the accomplice account is unnatural or lacks assurance, the prudential rule against unsafe reliance on uncorroborated accomplice evidence is not satisfied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173826