<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173817</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the legal profession does not constitute a commercial activity. Therefore, electricity consumption for an advocate&#039;s office cannot be charged at commercial rates unless the premises are used exclusively for professional purposes. The Court referred the matter to a larger Bench for further consideration, noting the need to re-evaluate the interpretation in a previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173817</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the legal profession does not constitute a commercial activity. Therefore, electricity consumption for an advocate&#039;s office cannot be charged at commercial rates unless the premises are used exclusively for professional purposes. The Court referred the matter to a larger Bench for further consideration, noting the need to re-evaluate the interpretation in a previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>