<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 618 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173814</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the notice issued to the assessee u/s 147/148 was beyond the prescribed time limit, as there was no failure to disclose material facts, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The Court found no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the appeal u/s 260(A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 618 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173814</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the notice issued to the assessee u/s 147/148 was beyond the prescribed time limit, as there was no failure to disclose material facts, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The Court found no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the appeal u/s 260(A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>