https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264366 The appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the Original Order was successful. The appellant's method of paying service tax on various services, including exempted ones, without maintaining separate accounts was deemed acceptable. The appellant's retrospective exercise of the option under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for previous periods was upheld, supported by compliance with CBEC Circular No. 868/6/2008-CX. The court found the appellant's consistent payment according to prescribed percentages for exempted services valid, leading to the allowance of the appeal with necessary relief. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264366 The appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the Original Order was successful. The appellant's method of paying service tax on various services, including exempted ones, without maintaining separate accounts was deemed acceptable. The appellant's retrospective exercise of the option under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for previous periods was upheld, supported by compliance with CBEC Circular No. 868/6/2008-CX. The court found the appellant's consistent payment according to prescribed percentages for exempted services valid, leading to the allowance of the appeal with necessary relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264366