<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1024 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264356</link>
    <description>By-products arising in the refining of crude vegetable oil, including fatty acids, wax and gum, were treated as marketable commercial products and not as &quot;waste&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE. The reasoning distinguished waste as refuse or discarded material having little or no value fit only to be discarded, whereas commercially valuable by-products fell outside that description. A contrary coordinate Bench view was held incorrect, but conflicting Bench decisions and prior proceedings created sufficient doubt to warrant authoritative resolution. The issue was therefore referred to the Hon&#039;ble President for constitution of a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1024 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264356</link>
      <description>By-products arising in the refining of crude vegetable oil, including fatty acids, wax and gum, were treated as marketable commercial products and not as &quot;waste&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE. The reasoning distinguished waste as refuse or discarded material having little or no value fit only to be discarded, whereas commercially valuable by-products fell outside that description. A contrary coordinate Bench view was held incorrect, but conflicting Bench decisions and prior proceedings created sufficient doubt to warrant authoritative resolution. The issue was therefore referred to the Hon&#039;ble President for constitution of a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>