https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264354 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that classified by-products Bagasse and Press Mud as exempted goods for the purpose of reversing an amount under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on established case law, including decisions by the Allahabad High Court and the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that Bagasse and similar by-products are not exempted goods. The appeal was decided in favor of the Appellant, emphasizing that reliance on CBEC Circulars by the First Appellate Authority was not sustainable. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:13:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264354 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that classified by-products Bagasse and Press Mud as exempted goods for the purpose of reversing an amount under Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on established case law, including decisions by the Allahabad High Court and the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that Bagasse and similar by-products are not exempted goods. The appeal was decided in favor of the Appellant, emphasizing that reliance on CBEC Circulars by the First Appellate Authority was not sustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264354