<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred on the Mawa project was revenue in nature and allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that the expenses did not create any enduring benefit and should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and directed the AO to delete the addition, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred on the Mawa project was revenue in nature and allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that the expenses did not create any enduring benefit and should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and directed the AO to delete the addition, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>