<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 916 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for rectification, adding the consultant&#039;s name in the cause title and considering submissions regarding the exclusion of courses conducted by BIFT from the definition of commercial training or coaching institute. The Tribunal emphasized the need to address all relevant arguments in the final order, ensuring fair consideration of legal provisions and implications for the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 916 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for rectification, adding the consultant&#039;s name in the cause title and considering submissions regarding the exclusion of courses conducted by BIFT from the definition of commercial training or coaching institute. The Tribunal emphasized the need to address all relevant arguments in the final order, ensuring fair consideration of legal provisions and implications for the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>