<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (12) TMI 9 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173803</link>
    <description>In a default assessment under the Income-tax Act, the authorities must make a fair estimate on relevant material, and a receipts basis may properly be adopted where contract income accrues on completion and entitlement to payment. The direction to assess contract receipts on that basis was upheld. A lower profit rate could not be justified merely by referring to rates in other cases; the rate had to rest on evidence relevant to the assessee&#039;s own facts, so the Tribunal&#039;s reduction from 40 per cent. to 30 per cent. was disapproved. Rule 9 of Schedule I of the Excess Profits Tax Act applied only to contracts extending beyond the accounting period and was inapplicable to contracts completed within it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (12) TMI 9 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173803</link>
      <description>In a default assessment under the Income-tax Act, the authorities must make a fair estimate on relevant material, and a receipts basis may properly be adopted where contract income accrues on completion and entitlement to payment. The direction to assess contract receipts on that basis was upheld. A lower profit rate could not be justified merely by referring to rates in other cases; the rate had to rest on evidence relevant to the assessee&#039;s own facts, so the Tribunal&#039;s reduction from 40 per cent. to 30 per cent. was disapproved. Rule 9 of Schedule I of the Excess Profits Tax Act applied only to contracts extending beyond the accounting period and was inapplicable to contracts completed within it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>