<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 935 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173764</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, finding no conclusive evidence linking the seized slips to the assessee&#039;s transactions. The court set aside the Joint Commissioner&#039;s order and upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, ultimately leading to the deletion of the penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1994-95.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 935 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173764</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, finding no conclusive evidence linking the seized slips to the assessee&#039;s transactions. The court set aside the Joint Commissioner&#039;s order and upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, ultimately leading to the deletion of the penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1994-95.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>