<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 493 - Cestat Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173763</link>
    <description>Penalty for duty short-payment was held unsustainable where the differential duty arose from a bona fide change in valuation rules, the goods were cleared under proper excise invoices, and the duty paid remained available as Cenvat credit to the recipient unit. The dispute was treated as revenue neutral, and the facts did not establish clandestine removal, suppression of facts, or any intention to evade duty. On that basis, the order setting aside the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 493 - Cestat Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173763</link>
      <description>Penalty for duty short-payment was held unsustainable where the differential duty arose from a bona fide change in valuation rules, the goods were cleared under proper excise invoices, and the duty paid remained available as Cenvat credit to the recipient unit. The dispute was treated as revenue neutral, and the facts did not establish clandestine removal, suppression of facts, or any intention to evade duty. On that basis, the order setting aside the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>