https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173760 The High Court found that the Commissioner of Customs violated principles of natural justice by revoking the petitioner's CHA license without disclosing the grounds for disagreement with the Inquiry Officer's findings. The Court set aside the original order, directing the Commissioner to provide the grounds for disagreement, allow the petitioner to respond, and then pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner. The Commissioner was given specific timelines to follow in this process, and the petitioner was prohibited from conducting business under the CHA license until a new order was issued. The Court made the rule absolute in the specified terms, with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:21:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173760 The High Court found that the Commissioner of Customs violated principles of natural justice by revoking the petitioner's CHA license without disclosing the grounds for disagreement with the Inquiry Officer's findings. The Court set aside the original order, directing the Commissioner to provide the grounds for disagreement, allow the petitioner to respond, and then pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner. The Commissioner was given specific timelines to follow in this process, and the petitioner was prohibited from conducting business under the CHA license until a new order was issued. The Court made the rule absolute in the specified terms, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173760